A hired mourner is not like a bereaved mourner.

In a statement that is not without meanings of great importance in understanding Iran's strategic shift from the policy of building its military arms in some Arab countries, Iran denied its involvement in the bombing of the home of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu. It did not stop at the denial, but rather followed up its denial with the confirmation that the one who carried out the bombing was Hezbollah, which has not issued any statement so far claiming responsibility for the operation.

It seems from the statement that Iran has replaced Hezbollah in leading and managing the battle to defend Tehran from within Lebanon, which means that its investment in Hezbollah should not go to waste. That is, this huge arsenal of missiles and drones, which Tehran prevented Hezbollah from using when its leader Hassan Nasrallah was killed, was prepared for other uses related to Tehran’s strategic security.

It is clear that Tehran no longer cares much about the fate that will befall Hezbollah, especially if we closely follow the developments of the political and military situation on the Lebanese scene, and how Tehran is trying to make Lebanon a station for settling scores with Israel, in which the battle will end with the end of Hezbollah’s military power as a price for avoiding war with Israel.

There is no doubt that this Iranian statement, which attributes the bombing of Netanyahu's house to Hezbollah, does not come without reason. It is conclusive evidence of its incitement of Israel to continue intensifying its brutal bombing of Lebanon, after it had stopped relatively for reasons related to preparing for an attack on Iran according to what Israel is planning.

That is, Iran is inciting against Lebanon to avoid war, and this is what the policy of massive investment in Hezbollah over the decades indicates. However, this issue remains a subject of wide controversy and major disagreements between the state and the Revolutionary Guards.

However, Israel’s calculations, as is clear from the statements of its leaders, especially after these developments that Tehran sparked from Lebanon, including targeting Netanyahu’s home and interpreting it as an assassination attempt, in the belief that it will rebuild the confrontation process with different rules that will avoid confrontation, have begun to exceed the extent in which Tehran is moving. The Israelis are no longer talking about a single goal related to the return of the residents of northern Israel and ensuring their security, but rather they have used this not to radically change their goals but to convince the world of them, as they began to talk about “comprehensive strategic security changes in the region.”

Iran has created excuses for Israel to silence anyone who has pointed a finger of objection at Israel recently, in a way it never dreamed of, to change its goals in this way, where it has returned to bombarding northern Gaza, is thinking about the displacement process again, and is rebuilding its strategy according to “the dangers surrounding it,” as it claims.

Iran, Israel and the whole world realize that the resistance in Gaza and Palestine is not like the "resistance" of the so-called squares. The bereaved mourner is not like the hired mourner. In Palestine, there is a cause that does not end with destruction or killing of any kind. However, this destruction and killing, which has continued for more than seventy-five years, must accumulate a state of awareness of the purity of this just cause from any opportunistic polarizations that make its fate permanent destruction. It must be rebuilt with contents that renew the building of a generation of scholars, economic, cultural, and cognitive power centers, politicians and those loyal to their just cause, not just generations of fighters. Palestine is a birthplace on all levels, and then Iran, the so-called squares, or others will not dare to be pretentious in the name of this cause.

The entire region today faces serious challenges, especially since the strategic security that the leaders of Israel talk about cannot be defined geographically selectively, as the surrounding region is its intended geography. However, Iran, which has ignited strife and societal division in the Arab countries, has prepared the conditions that Israel needed to implement its aggressive policies.

(From the author's page)